Malinowski’s functionalism has several key features that make it distinctive and influential in anthropology:
- Systematic Fieldwork: Unlike the broad and often vague descriptions of social phenomena by 19th-century scholars, Malinowski provided detailed, systematic accounts based on his fieldwork. He lived among the people he studied, documenting their lives in a clear and organized manner. This approach gave a well-rounded view of the societies he observed.
- Focus on Specific Aspects: Malinowski’s method involved concentrating on one aspect of a culture before examining the culture as a whole. This approach helped to create a cohesive and detailed picture of the society. By focusing on specific cultural elements, he could connect them to the broader cultural context effectively.
- Emphasis on Individual Behavior: Malinowski highlighted the importance of individuals, their actions, and emotional states. He believed that understanding individual behaviour was crucial to understanding cultural patterns. This focus on individual needs and interests helped balance his view of how societies functioned and how social order was maintained.
- Awareness of Tension Between Words and Actions: Malinowski recognized that there can be a gap between what people say and what they actually do. He was aware of the tension between individual desires and social expectations. For example, in his study of exchanges in the “Argonauts of the Western Pacific,” he explored how reciprocal exchanges shape social relationships. This idea influenced other scholars like Marcel Mauss and Claude Lévi-Strauss, who further developed the concept of reciprocity and its role in social control.
Overall, Malinowski’s functionalism is noted for its detailed fieldwork, focus on specific cultural aspects, attention to individual behaviour, and its insights into the complexities of social interactions.
Copyright @ Sociology IGNOU.